<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shuttleworth&#8217;s Response to Dell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://humani.st/shuttleworths-response-to-dell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://humani.st/shuttleworths-response-to-dell/</link>
	<description>Computer Science, Business, Blogging, and Technology Blog by Luke Hoersten</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Hoersten</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/shuttleworths-response-to-dell/comment-page-1/#comment-10594</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Hoersten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/207#comment-10594</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; choose the cheapest package regardless of the OS and this is where Dell&#039;s made most of its money. Right now, I think the biggest market for Linux on Dells will be companies who don&#039;t want to make the jump to Vista. It&#039;s too resource intensive and will force a lot of companies to buy new computers. With Linux, they will still buy new computers (if not Dells) but they can get cheaper new computers without the Vista expense overhead or keep their current computers (if they are Dells) and have Linux supported on them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, like I said in my article, I didn&#039;t see any advice from Shuttleworth, only observations. Maybe devil&#039;s advocate was a bit harsh but you get my point: I didn&#039;t like the negative spin on his article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>do</i> choose the cheapest package regardless of the OS and this is where Dell&#8217;s made most of its money. Right now, I think the biggest market for Linux on Dells will be companies who don&#8217;t want to make the jump to Vista. It&#8217;s too resource intensive and will force a lot of companies to buy new computers. With Linux, they will still buy new computers (if not Dells) but they can get cheaper new computers without the Vista expense overhead or keep their current computers (if they are Dells) and have Linux supported on them.</p>
<p>Also, like I said in my article, I didn&#8217;t see any advice from Shuttleworth, only observations. Maybe devil&#8217;s advocate was a bit harsh but you get my point: I didn&#8217;t like the negative spin on his article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Olson</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/shuttleworths-response-to-dell/comment-page-1/#comment-10595</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/207#comment-10595</guid>
		<description>W.r.t. &quot;Dell is marketing Linux desktops/laptops to users that are already using Linux&quot;:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In fact, this is probably true.  People won&#039;t request GNU/Linux on their computer unless they are familiar with it, or are very daring and cheap like some college students.  At work, for example, we want Dell to support GNU/Linux in their diagnostics tools so that we don&#039;t have to stick a CD in the tray and reboot -- also, it would get us slightly less runaround when trying to convince Dell that there is in fact a problem if they explicitly supported GNU/Linux.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;W.r.t. &quot;heâ€™s chosen himself to play devils advocate in this discussion&quot;:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not really.  He&#039;s trying to give Dell advice about how to market Linux, and what their likely audience will be.  When you&#039;re addressing a different audience, you have to bend a little and try to meet them halfway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>W.r.t. &#8220;Dell is marketing Linux desktops/laptops to users that are already using Linux&#8221;:</p>
<p>In fact, this is probably true.  People won&#8217;t request GNU/Linux on their computer unless they are familiar with it, or are very daring and cheap like some college students.  At work, for example, we want Dell to support GNU/Linux in their diagnostics tools so that we don&#8217;t have to stick a CD in the tray and reboot &#8212; also, it would get us slightly less runaround when trying to convince Dell that there is in fact a problem if they explicitly supported GNU/Linux.</p>
<p>W.r.t. &#8220;heâ€™s chosen himself to play devils advocate in this discussion&#8221;:</p>
<p>Not really.  He&#8217;s trying to give Dell advice about how to market Linux, and what their likely audience will be.  When you&#8217;re addressing a different audience, you have to bend a little and try to meet them halfway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Hoersten</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/shuttleworths-response-to-dell/comment-page-1/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Hoersten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/207#comment-856</guid>
		<description>You haven&#039;t convinced me that Dell is marketing Linux to people that are already using Linux. That market is just way too small. Most of the Linux users I know would rather build their own PC or use an old free one, diminishing the market even more. Also it&#039;s a very small percentage of the desktop market. I&#039;d guess less than 1%.

Most people in fact &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; choose the cheapest package regardless of the OS and this is where Dell&#039;s made most of its money. Right now, I think the biggest market for Linux on Dells will be companies who don&#039;t want to make the jump to Vista. It&#039;s too resource intensive and will force a lot of companies to buy new computers. With Linux, they will still buy new computers (if not Dells) but they can get cheaper new computers without the Vista expense overhead or keep their current computers (if they are Dells) and have Linux supported on them.

Also, like I said in my article, I didn&#039;t see any advice from Shuttleworth, only observations. Maybe devil&#039;s advocate was a bit harsh but you get my point: I didn&#039;t like the negative spin on his article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You haven&#8217;t convinced me that Dell is marketing Linux to people that are already using Linux. That market is just way too small. Most of the Linux users I know would rather build their own PC or use an old free one, diminishing the market even more. Also it&#8217;s a very small percentage of the desktop market. I&#8217;d guess less than 1%.</p>
<p>Most people in fact <i>do</i> choose the cheapest package regardless of the OS and this is where Dell&#8217;s made most of its money. Right now, I think the biggest market for Linux on Dells will be companies who don&#8217;t want to make the jump to Vista. It&#8217;s too resource intensive and will force a lot of companies to buy new computers. With Linux, they will still buy new computers (if not Dells) but they can get cheaper new computers without the Vista expense overhead or keep their current computers (if they are Dells) and have Linux supported on them.</p>
<p>Also, like I said in my article, I didn&#8217;t see any advice from Shuttleworth, only observations. Maybe devil&#8217;s advocate was a bit harsh but you get my point: I didn&#8217;t like the negative spin on his article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Olson</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/shuttleworths-response-to-dell/comment-page-1/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/207#comment-854</guid>
		<description>W.r.t. &quot;Dell is marketing Linux desktops/laptops to users that are already using Linux&quot;:

In fact, this is probably true.  People won&#039;t request GNU/Linux on their computer unless they are familiar with it, or are very daring and cheap like some college students.  At work, for example, we want Dell to support GNU/Linux in their diagnostics tools so that we don&#039;t have to stick a CD in the tray and reboot -- also, it would get us slightly less runaround when trying to convince Dell that there is in fact a problem if they explicitly supported GNU/Linux.

W.r.t. &quot;heâ€™s chosen himself to play devils advocate in this discussion&quot;:

Not really.  He&#039;s trying to give Dell advice about how to market Linux, and what their likely audience will be.  When you&#039;re addressing a different audience, you have to bend a little and try to meet them halfway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>W.r.t. &#8220;Dell is marketing Linux desktops/laptops to users that are already using Linux&#8221;:</p>
<p>In fact, this is probably true.  People won&#8217;t request GNU/Linux on their computer unless they are familiar with it, or are very daring and cheap like some college students.  At work, for example, we want Dell to support GNU/Linux in their diagnostics tools so that we don&#8217;t have to stick a CD in the tray and reboot &#8212; also, it would get us slightly less runaround when trying to convince Dell that there is in fact a problem if they explicitly supported GNU/Linux.</p>
<p>W.r.t. &#8220;heâ€™s chosen himself to play devils advocate in this discussion&#8221;:</p>
<p>Not really.  He&#8217;s trying to give Dell advice about how to market Linux, and what their likely audience will be.  When you&#8217;re addressing a different audience, you have to bend a little and try to meet them halfway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
