<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft: Pirates of Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://humani.st/microsoft-pirates-of-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://humani.st/microsoft-pirates-of-technology/</link>
	<description>Computer Science, Business, Blogging, and Technology Blog by Luke Hoersten</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 14:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Hoersten</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/microsoft-pirates-of-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-10564</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Hoersten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/283#comment-10564</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://finance.google.com/finance?chdnp=1=1=1=1=maximized=0=0=1193190952000=1173=NASDAQ:MSFT=NASDAQ:AAPL&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;money is&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.9to5mac.com/apple-passes-ibm-in-market-cap-24353434&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Apple has surpassed IBM&lt;/a&gt; in it&#039;s market cap as well. Microsoft &lt;em&gt;made&lt;/em&gt; its money in niche creation (office apps and OSs) and was innovative in their own way. You say that &quot;they [Microsoft] wonâ€™t succeed by moving away from their core competencies at this late stage&quot; but that&#039;s not what I&#039;m suggesting. On the contrary, I&#039;m suggesting this is what they &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; trying to do by modeling all these other &quot;hipper&quot; products and they are failing at it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My point &lt;strong&gt;wasn&#039;t&lt;/strong&gt; to show that Apple is better than Microsoft because that&#039;s like trying to compare Apples to oranges ;). I&#039;m merely trying to point out that Microsoft is suffering with their new products and that continuing on the same path will not save them. Microsoft had flown so high in the past, though, that they have a long fall before it&#039;s too late to find it&#039;s parachute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?chdnp=1=1=1=1=maximized=0=0=1193190952000=1173=NASDAQ:MSFT=NASDAQ:AAPL" rel="nofollow">money is</a>. <a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/apple-passes-ibm-in-market-cap-24353434" rel="nofollow">Apple has surpassed IBM</a> in it&#8217;s market cap as well. Microsoft <em>made</em> its money in niche creation (office apps and OSs) and was innovative in their own way. You say that &#8220;they [Microsoft] wonâ€™t succeed by moving away from their core competencies at this late stage&#8221; but that&#8217;s not what I&#8217;m suggesting. On the contrary, I&#8217;m suggesting this is what they <em>are</em> trying to do by modeling all these other &#8220;hipper&#8221; products and they are failing at it.</p>
<p>My point <strong>wasn&#8217;t</strong> to show that Apple is better than Microsoft because that&#8217;s like trying to compare Apples to oranges <img src='http://humani.st/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> . I&#8217;m merely trying to point out that Microsoft is suffering with their new products and that continuing on the same path will not save them. Microsoft had flown so high in the past, though, that they have a long fall before it&#8217;s too late to find it&#8217;s parachute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/microsoft-pirates-of-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-10565</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/283#comment-10565</guid>
		<description>I followed you up until the last two sentences.  First of all, Apple has a long way to go to prove that that&#039;s where the money is in comparison to Microsoft.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Microsoft have put out some good software over the years, but they&#039;ve never innovated.  Their biggest claim to creating a niche was actually IBM&#039;s biggest gaffe in the early 80s.  These days they are collapsing under the weight of their own beauracracy, but even without that, they&#039;re strength has always been business and positioning, not innovation.  They won&#039;t succeed by moving away from their core competencies at this late stage.  If thousands of younger and hipper companies can&#039;t be Apple, how the hell is Microsoft gonna have any chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I followed you up until the last two sentences.  First of all, Apple has a long way to go to prove that that&#8217;s where the money is in comparison to Microsoft.</p>
<p>Microsoft have put out some good software over the years, but they&#8217;ve never innovated.  Their biggest claim to creating a niche was actually IBM&#8217;s biggest gaffe in the early 80s.  These days they are collapsing under the weight of their own beauracracy, but even without that, they&#8217;re strength has always been business and positioning, not innovation.  They won&#8217;t succeed by moving away from their core competencies at this late stage.  If thousands of younger and hipper companies can&#8217;t be Apple, how the hell is Microsoft gonna have any chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Hoersten</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/microsoft-pirates-of-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-8378</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Hoersten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/283#comment-8378</guid>
		<description>I see where you&#039;re coming from, Gabe, but I think Apple has clearly proven that niche creation is where the &lt;a href=&quot;http://finance.google.com/finance?chdnp=1&amp;chdd=1&amp;chds=1&amp;chdv=1&amp;chvs=maximized&amp;chdeh=0&amp;chfdeh=0&amp;chdet=1193190952000&amp;chddm=1173&amp;cmpto=NASDAQ:MSFT&amp;q=NASDAQ:AAPL&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;money is&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.9to5mac.com/apple-passes-ibm-in-market-cap-24353434&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Apple has surpassed IBM&lt;/a&gt; in it&#039;s market cap as well. Microsoft &lt;em&gt;made&lt;/em&gt; its money in niche creation (office apps and OSs) and was innovative in their own way. You say that &quot;they [Microsoft] wonâ€™t succeed by moving away from their core competencies at this late stage&quot; but that&#039;s not what I&#039;m suggesting. On the contrary, I&#039;m suggesting this is what they &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; trying to do by modeling all these other &quot;hipper&quot; products and they are failing at it.

My point &lt;strong&gt;wasn&#039;t&lt;/strong&gt; to show that Apple is better than Microsoft because that&#039;s like trying to compare Apples to oranges ;). I&#039;m merely trying to point out that Microsoft is suffering with their new products and that continuing on the same path will not save them. Microsoft had flown so high in the past, though, that they have a long fall before it&#039;s too late to find it&#039;s parachute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see where you&#8217;re coming from, Gabe, but I think Apple has clearly proven that niche creation is where the <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?chdnp=1&#038;chdd=1&#038;chds=1&#038;chdv=1&#038;chvs=maximized&#038;chdeh=0&#038;chfdeh=0&#038;chdet=1193190952000&#038;chddm=1173&#038;cmpto=NASDAQ:MSFT&#038;q=NASDAQ:AAPL" rel="nofollow">money is</a>. <a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/apple-passes-ibm-in-market-cap-24353434" rel="nofollow">Apple has surpassed IBM</a> in it&#8217;s market cap as well. Microsoft <em>made</em> its money in niche creation (office apps and OSs) and was innovative in their own way. You say that &#8220;they [Microsoft] wonâ€™t succeed by moving away from their core competencies at this late stage&#8221; but that&#8217;s not what I&#8217;m suggesting. On the contrary, I&#8217;m suggesting this is what they <em>are</em> trying to do by modeling all these other &#8220;hipper&#8221; products and they are failing at it.</p>
<p>My point <strong>wasn&#8217;t</strong> to show that Apple is better than Microsoft because that&#8217;s like trying to compare Apples to oranges <img src='http://humani.st/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> . I&#8217;m merely trying to point out that Microsoft is suffering with their new products and that continuing on the same path will not save them. Microsoft had flown so high in the past, though, that they have a long fall before it&#8217;s too late to find it&#8217;s parachute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/microsoft-pirates-of-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-8376</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/283#comment-8376</guid>
		<description>I followed you up until the last two sentences.  First of all, Apple has a long way to go to prove that that&#039;s where the money is in comparison to Microsoft.

Microsoft have put out some good software over the years, but they&#039;ve never innovated.  Their biggest claim to creating a niche was actually IBM&#039;s biggest gaffe in the early 80s.  These days they are collapsing under the weight of their own beauracracy, but even without that, they&#039;re strength has always been business and positioning, not innovation.  They won&#039;t succeed by moving away from their core competencies at this late stage.  If thousands of younger and hipper companies can&#039;t be Apple, how the hell is Microsoft gonna have any chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I followed you up until the last two sentences.  First of all, Apple has a long way to go to prove that that&#8217;s where the money is in comparison to Microsoft.</p>
<p>Microsoft have put out some good software over the years, but they&#8217;ve never innovated.  Their biggest claim to creating a niche was actually IBM&#8217;s biggest gaffe in the early 80s.  These days they are collapsing under the weight of their own beauracracy, but even without that, they&#8217;re strength has always been business and positioning, not innovation.  They won&#8217;t succeed by moving away from their core competencies at this late stage.  If thousands of younger and hipper companies can&#8217;t be Apple, how the hell is Microsoft gonna have any chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

