<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Learning Distributed Revision Control Systems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://humani.st/learning-distributed-revision-control-systems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://humani.st/learning-distributed-revision-control-systems/</link>
	<description>Computer Science, Business, Blogging, and Technology Blog by Luke Hoersten</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Hoersten</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/learning-distributed-revision-control-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-10788</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Hoersten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/260#comment-10788</guid>
		<description>No problem. When I was first learning about DRCS the docs were slim and the human explanations were even slimmer so I started collecting my favorite sources as I went along. Hopefully this will help convince your teammates as well that DRCS is here to say!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem. When I was first learning about DRCS the docs were slim and the human explanations were even slimmer so I started collecting my favorite sources as I went along. Hopefully this will help convince your teammates as well that DRCS is here to say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Hoersten</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/learning-distributed-revision-control-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-10370</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Hoersten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/260#comment-10370</guid>
		<description>No problem. When I was first learning about DRCS the docs were slim and the human explanations were even slimmer so I started collecting my favorite sources as I went along. Hopefully this will help convince your teammates as well that DRCS is here to say!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem. When I was first learning about DRCS the docs were slim and the human explanations were even slimmer so I started collecting my favorite sources as I went along. Hopefully this will help convince your teammates as well that DRCS is here to say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ning</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/learning-distributed-revision-control-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-10369</link>
		<dc:creator>ning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/260#comment-10369</guid>
		<description>Great introduction! It showed me where I should go further to. Thanks a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great introduction! It showed me where I should go further to. Thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Hoersten</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/learning-distributed-revision-control-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-10372</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Hoersten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/260#comment-10372</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re completely right about them being fast moving. They&#039;re almost all different beasts now. I started using Git full time again last week and it definitely still had the same interface issues compared to Mercurial. I haven&#039;t used Bazaar at all for quite some time and haven&#039;t tried Mercurial v1.0 yet (I still use 0.9.5 every day).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the changes are enough to negate my opinions about each system, I will totally write about it. I still think Mercurial, despite being one of the youngest, has the most potential. Git would have to revamp the entire command line interface to catch up in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re completely right about them being fast moving. They&#8217;re almost all different beasts now. I started using Git full time again last week and it definitely still had the same interface issues compared to Mercurial. I haven&#8217;t used Bazaar at all for quite some time and haven&#8217;t tried Mercurial v1.0 yet (I still use 0.9.5 every day).</p>
<p>If the changes are enough to negate my opinions about each system, I will totally write about it. I still think Mercurial, despite being one of the youngest, has the most potential. Git would have to revamp the entire command line interface to catch up in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Plys</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/learning-distributed-revision-control-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-10371</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Plys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/260#comment-10371</guid>
		<description>Does anybody know of any unbiased comparison of the *current* versions of git, GNU Bazaar and Mercurial?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All I&#039;ve seen is rather old (DVCS are young and changing quickly).&lt;br&gt;Bazaar is now pretty fast, git is becoming easy to use and crossplatform, Mercurial has reached v1.0...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody know of any unbiased comparison of the *current* versions of git, GNU Bazaar and Mercurial?</p>
<p>All I&#8217;ve seen is rather old (DVCS are young and changing quickly).<br />Bazaar is now pretty fast, git is becoming easy to use and crossplatform, Mercurial has reached v1.0&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Humani.st &#8594; Shortcomings of Mercurial</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/learning-distributed-revision-control-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-10110</link>
		<dc:creator>Humani.st &#8594; Shortcomings of Mercurial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/260#comment-10110</guid>
		<description>[...] is, by far, the best revision control application I&#8217;ve ever used, with Git a close second. Fundamentally, Mercurial does revision [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is, by far, the best revision control application I&#8217;ve ever used, with Git a close second. Fundamentally, Mercurial does revision [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Hoersten</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/learning-distributed-revision-control-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-10374</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Hoersten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 21:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/260#comment-10374</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve hear quite a bit about darcs (most DRCS emacs modes are based on the darcs mode) though I&#039;ve never used it myself. Do you have much experience with it? Any comments about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve hear quite a bit about darcs (most DRCS emacs modes are based on the darcs mode) though I&#8217;ve never used it myself. Do you have much experience with it? Any comments about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Goldman</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/learning-distributed-revision-control-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-10373</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 21:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/260#comment-10373</guid>
		<description>Another DRCS is darcs.  Written, I believe, in Haskell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another DRCS is darcs.  Written, I believe, in Haskell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenRadix.org &#8594; Shortcomings of Mercurial</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/learning-distributed-revision-control-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-10098</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenRadix.org &#8594; Shortcomings of Mercurial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/260#comment-10098</guid>
		<description>[...] is, by far, the best revision control application I&#8217;ve ever used, with Git a close second. Fundamentally, Mercurial does revision [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is, by far, the best revision control application I&#8217;ve ever used, with Git a close second. Fundamentally, Mercurial does revision [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logan Buesching</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/learning-distributed-revision-control-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-8828</link>
		<dc:creator>Logan Buesching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/260#comment-8828</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure when they added it, but they now have a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/WindowsInstallers&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Batteries Included&quot;&lt;/a&gt; installer for Mercurial, which would have probably shut me up from all of my complaining about it&#039;s lack of windows support - this should by far be more heavily advertised for windows users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure when they added it, but they now have a <a href="http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/WindowsInstallers" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Batteries Included&#8221;</a> installer for Mercurial, which would have probably shut me up from all of my complaining about it&#8217;s lack of windows support &#8211; this should by far be more heavily advertised for windows users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
