<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is a GUI a Document?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://humani.st/is-a-gui-a-document/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://humani.st/is-a-gui-a-document/</link>
	<description>Computer Science, Business, Blogging, and Technology Blog by Luke Hoersten</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Hoersten</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/is-a-gui-a-document/comment-page-1/#comment-10297</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Hoersten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 05:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/253#comment-10297</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;can&lt;/em&gt; there be an adequate development model?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, the current big wig tools (php, ruby, etc) are retrofitted with frameworks and if you&#039;ve worked with any of that at all... the development model is pretty damn good.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t think HTML was originally designed with dynamic user interfaces in mind but surely was designed with the idea of displaying as &lt;em&gt;many&lt;/em&gt; types of unforeseeable documents as possible. That&#039;s the beauty of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>can</em> there be an adequate development model?</p>
<p>Of course, the current big wig tools (php, ruby, etc) are retrofitted with frameworks and if you&#8217;ve worked with any of that at all&#8230; the development model is pretty damn good.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think HTML was originally designed with dynamic user interfaces in mind but surely was designed with the idea of displaying as <em>many</em> types of unforeseeable documents as possible. That&#8217;s the beauty of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Hoersten</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/is-a-gui-a-document/comment-page-1/#comment-6809</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Hoersten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 04:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/253#comment-6809</guid>
		<description>I thought the same thing when I read about his software being unintuitive... that just means he&#039;s a bad programmer =) . The article that he was commenting on, though, did talk about developing a nicer programming model for this new type of &quot;dynamic document&quot; (to quote myself). If you think about it, all the current languages pretty much predate the popularity of AJAX so how &lt;em&gt;can&lt;/em&gt; there be an adequate development model?

Of course, the current big wig tools (php, ruby, etc) are retrofitted with frameworks and if you&#039;ve worked with any of that at all... the development model is pretty damn good.

I don&#039;t think HTML was originally designed with dynamic user interfaces in mind but surely was designed with the idea of displaying as &lt;em&gt;many&lt;/em&gt; types of unforeseeable documents as possible. That&#039;s the beauty of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the same thing when I read about his software being unintuitive&#8230; that just means he&#8217;s a bad programmer =) . The article that he was commenting on, though, did talk about developing a nicer programming model for this new type of &#8220;dynamic document&#8221; (to quote myself). If you think about it, all the current languages pretty much predate the popularity of AJAX so how <em>can</em> there be an adequate development model?</p>
<p>Of course, the current big wig tools (php, ruby, etc) are retrofitted with frameworks and if you&#8217;ve worked with any of that at all&#8230; the development model is pretty damn good.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think HTML was originally designed with dynamic user interfaces in mind but surely was designed with the idea of displaying as <em>many</em> types of unforeseeable documents as possible. That&#8217;s the beauty of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logan Buesching</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/is-a-gui-a-document/comment-page-1/#comment-10298</link>
		<dc:creator>Logan Buesching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 02:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/253#comment-10298</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Just because you understand one technology, and can develop well in it, doesn&#039;t mean that another technology you don&#039;t know very well cannot produce as-good results!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do agree that a web browser, and HTML was not initially designed to be as dynamic  as a user interface, but things are evolving, which is why we are getting AJAX/JSON/CSS/X[ML&#124;SL].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Just because you understand one technology, and can develop well in it, doesn&#8217;t mean that another technology you don&#8217;t know very well cannot produce as-good results!</b></p>
<p>I do agree that a web browser, and HTML was not initially designed to be as dynamic  as a user interface, but things are evolving, which is why we are getting AJAX/JSON/CSS/X[ML|SL].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logan Buesching</title>
		<link>http://humani.st/is-a-gui-a-document/comment-page-1/#comment-6807</link>
		<dc:creator>Logan Buesching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 01:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openradix.org/archives/253#comment-6807</guid>
		<description>I just read that article, and I have to call bullshit on some of his reasonings.  Saying that web applications respond slower, yes, but that&#039;s because AJAX/JSON is new technology that hasn&#039;t yet matured.  Things will speed up.  

Saying that his AJAX applications were buggier and unintuitive?  W T F mate?  The programs didn&#039;t write themselves.  SOMEBODY made them buggy and unintuitive!  You can say the same about any Swing/MFC/WinForm/GTK GUI.  &lt;b&gt;Just because you understand one technology, and can develop well in it, doesn&#039;t mean that another technology you don&#039;t know very well cannot produce as-good results!&lt;/b&gt;

I do agree that a web browser, and HTML was not initially designed to be as dynamic  as a user interface, but things are evolving, which is why we are getting AJAX/JSON/CSS/X[ML&#124;SL].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read that article, and I have to call bullshit on some of his reasonings.  Saying that web applications respond slower, yes, but that&#8217;s because AJAX/JSON is new technology that hasn&#8217;t yet matured.  Things will speed up.  </p>
<p>Saying that his AJAX applications were buggier and unintuitive?  W T F mate?  The programs didn&#8217;t write themselves.  SOMEBODY made them buggy and unintuitive!  You can say the same about any Swing/MFC/WinForm/GTK GUI.  <b>Just because you understand one technology, and can develop well in it, doesn&#8217;t mean that another technology you don&#8217;t know very well cannot produce as-good results!</b></p>
<p>I do agree that a web browser, and HTML was not initially designed to be as dynamic  as a user interface, but things are evolving, which is why we are getting AJAX/JSON/CSS/X[ML|SL].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
