Comments on: Firefox 3 Speedups http://humani.st/firefox-3-speedups/ Computer Science, Business, Blogging, and Technology Blog by Luke Hoersten Thu, 10 May 2012 14:35:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Luke Hoersten http://humani.st/firefox-3-speedups/comment-page-1/#comment-10779 Luke Hoersten Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:35:48 +0000 http://openradix.org/archives/300#comment-10779 Yea, FF2 was known to be slow on Linux and many bloggers (and probably others, though not publicizing it) were annoyed by this. Windows was definitely their target for v.2. I’m excited this isn’t the case for v.3 but it doesn’t mean I’m ready to switch just yet. I’ll wait for the plugins Yea, FF2 was known to be slow on Linux and many bloggers (and probably others, though not publicizing it) were annoyed by this. Windows was definitely their target for v.2. I’m excited this isn’t the case for v.3 but it doesn’t mean I’m ready to switch just yet. I’ll wait for the plugins

]]> By: Luke Hoersten http://humani.st/firefox-3-speedups/comment-page-1/#comment-9664 Luke Hoersten Thu, 29 Nov 2007 04:52:41 +0000 http://openradix.org/archives/300#comment-9664 Yea, FF2 was known to be slow on Linux and many bloggers (and probably others, though not publicizing it) were annoyed by this. Windows was definitely their target for v.2. I'm excited this isn't the case for v.3 but it doesn't mean I'm ready to switch just yet. I'll wait for the plugins ;-) . Yea, FF2 was known to be slow on Linux and many bloggers (and probably others, though not publicizing it) were annoyed by this. Windows was definitely their target for v.2. I’m excited this isn’t the case for v.3 but it doesn’t mean I’m ready to switch just yet. I’ll wait for the plugins ;-) .

]]> By: Luke Hoersten http://humani.st/firefox-3-speedups/comment-page-1/#comment-10494 Luke Hoersten Thu, 29 Nov 2007 04:52:41 +0000 http://openradix.org/archives/300#comment-10494 Yea, FF2 was known to be slow on Linux and many bloggers (and probably others, though not publicizing it) were annoyed by this. Windows was definitely their target for v.2. I'm excited this isn't the case for v.3 but it doesn't mean I'm ready to switch just yet. I'll wait for the plugins ;-) . Yea, FF2 was known to be slow on Linux and many bloggers (and probably others, though not publicizing it) were annoyed by this. Windows was definitely their target for v.2. I’m excited this isn’t the case for v.3 but it doesn’t mean I’m ready to switch just yet. I’ll wait for the plugins ;-) .

]]> By: Hank Feeser http://humani.st/firefox-3-speedups/comment-page-1/#comment-9663 Hank Feeser Thu, 29 Nov 2007 04:49:14 +0000 http://openradix.org/archives/300#comment-9663 As you are aware Luke, I'm running XP under Parallels running under OS X 10.5.1. I tried FF3B1 in this XP and did not find any noticeable improvement in speed. What i did notice, is a bunch of busted plugins :-) As you are aware Luke, I’m running XP under Parallels running
under OS X 10.5.1. I tried FF3B1 in this XP and did not find any
noticeable improvement in speed. What i did notice, is a bunch of
busted plugins :-)

]]> By: Hank Feeser http://humani.st/firefox-3-speedups/comment-page-1/#comment-10495 Hank Feeser Thu, 29 Nov 2007 04:49:14 +0000 http://openradix.org/archives/300#comment-10495 As you are aware Luke, I'm running XP under Parallels running<br>under OS X 10.5.1. I tried FF3B1 in this XP and did not find any<br>noticeable improvement in speed. What i did notice, is a bunch of<br>busted plugins :-) As you are aware Luke, I’m running XP under Parallels running
under OS X 10.5.1. I tried FF3B1 in this XP and did not find any
noticeable improvement in speed. What i did notice, is a bunch of
busted plugins :-)

]]> By: Luke Hoersten http://humani.st/firefox-3-speedups/comment-page-1/#comment-10497 Luke Hoersten Thu, 29 Nov 2007 04:35:48 +0000 http://openradix.org/archives/300#comment-10497 Yea, FF2 was known to be slow on Linux and many bloggers (and probably others, though not publicizing it) were annoyed by this. Windows was definitely their target for v.2. I’m excited this isn’t the case for v.3 but it doesn’t mean I’m ready to switch just yet. I’ll wait for the plugins Yea, FF2 was known to be slow on Linux and many bloggers (and probably others, though not publicizing it) were annoyed by this. Windows was definitely their target for v.2. I’m excited this isn’t the case for v.3 but it doesn’t mean I’m ready to switch just yet. I’ll wait for the plugins

]]> By: Hank Feeser http://humani.st/firefox-3-speedups/comment-page-1/#comment-10496 Hank Feeser Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:15:57 +0000 http://openradix.org/archives/300#comment-10496 As you are aware Luke, I'm running XP under Parallels running under OS X 10.5.1. I tried FF3B1 in this XP and did not find any noticeable improvement in speed. What i did notice, is a bunch of busted plugins :-) As you are aware Luke, I’m running XP under Parallels running under OS X 10.5.1. I tried FF3B1 in this XP and did not find any noticeable improvement in speed. What i did notice, is a bunch of busted plugins :-)

]]>